Den tidigare PL-domaren anser att båda Tottenhams straffar föregicks av offsides.
Den kontroversielle figuren Mark Clattenburg var inte särskild nöjd med domarnas insats i gårdagens minst sagt dramatiska drabbning mellan Liverpool och Spurs.
Om den första straffen skrev Clattenburg i The Times: The question is whether Dejan Lovren deliberately played the ball and has Kane, by being in an offside position, impacted Lovren.
The issue is not whether it touched the defender, but whether he played it deliberately.
You can make an argument that Lovren would not have made this type of attempt for the ball if Kane was not close to him and, therefore, the impact of his presence plays a part in the decision-making of the referee.
Även den andra straffen var inkorrekt, menar Clattenburg, som anser att Lamela var offside: The ball is touched by Fernando Llorente and into Erik Lamela, who is fractionally offside in my opinion.
As we have seen with VAR now, offside is a matter of fact and no benefit is given to the attacking team. Therefore, the penalty should not have been allowed.